When a standard payment provider is no longer enough, we build custom payment infrastructure around your product's logic: billing, payment gateway, crypto / fiat flows, routing, and fallback scenarios.
Dependence on a single providerWhen it goes down or imposes limits, revenue goes down with it. The business needs its own routing and fallback scenarios — not hope that one partner stays stable.
Multiple channels with no unified logicCrypto and fiat run separately, statuses drift apart, and support untangles disputed payments by hand. A single management layer is needed.
Subscriptions and recurring payments misbehaveRenewals are unreliable, billing logic is smeared across the code and the provider's dashboard, and recurring scenarios need constant workarounds.
Payments get lost on failuresSome transactions hang in an undefined state, callbacks arrive late or duplicated, and reconciliation takes manual work every day.
Different regions, different channelsCustomers in different countries want different payment methods. There's no system that can pick a route and switch when a channel is down.
The product grows, the payments layer doesn'tAdding a new provider or pricing model turns into a mini-project with the risk of breaking existing logic. The architecture isn't ready for growth.
The problem with most payment setups isn't that they don't work. They do — as long as everything follows the happy path. They break at the edges: a delayed callback, a temporary provider outage, a duplicate transaction, a conflict between a blockchain event and business logic.
We build payment infrastructure with an explicit state model, idempotency, retry logic, DLQ, and fallback routes — so the system behaves predictably even in imperfect scenarios.
That means the team can see transactions move, support doesn't operate in manual mode, and billing logic lives inside the system instead of being smeared across code and provider dashboards.
Routing across multiple channels plus fallback scenarios — one provider's outage doesn't stop the money flow.
Retry logic, idempotency, and DLQ — transactions don't get lost at the edges. Disputed cases go into a queue, not a manual review.
Subscriptions, renewals, expirations, and recurring payments follow one set of rules. The logic lives in the system, not in a developer's head.
Different behavior models, confirmation speeds, and finalization rules — all handled by a single layer without a zoo of special cases.
The team sees transaction flow, statuses, errors, and routes in one place. Support stops working by hand in provider dashboards.
A new provider or pricing model is an architecture extension, not an emergency refactor. The payments layer doesn't hold back scaling.
The client needed their own payment system for a Telegram product with subscription-based access. Standard solutions didn't fit: high fees, geographic restrictions, manual access management. An additional requirement was a non-custodial model: funds go directly to the owner's wallet, with nothing held inside the system. Payment acceptance, network monitoring, subscription management, and automated access delivery had to be assembled into one system — protected against duplicates, race conditions, and losses on failures.
We designed payment infrastructure, not just a "bot with payments". The system included: a Telegram Bot, a Payment Module, a Blockchain Listener for the Base network, a Subscription Module, an Access Module with automated issuing and revoking of invite links, and PostgreSQL + Redis for locks and queues. We built in idempotency keys, unique amounts for matching transfers, a 12-confirmation threshold, distributed locks, DLQ, a circuit breaker, and a retry policy. In v2 — a Web Admin Panel with metrics, transactions, and an audit log.
Python · FastAPI · aiogram · PostgreSQL · Redis · Base Network · USDT / cbBTC · Blockchain Listener · Idempotency · DLQ · Circuit Breaker · Distributed Locks · Web Admin Panel
The client got their own payment system for a Telegram product: crypto payments arrive directly, subscriptions and access work automatically, and the architecture is ready for production operation and scaling.
A product with active sales, but the payments layer started breaking under load. Some payments hung in an undefined state, subscriptions renewed unreliably, support untangled disputed charges by hand, and the final money picture was assembled from several provider dashboards. The problem wasn't "add one more payment method" — a single layer on top of multiple providers was needed.
We assembled a payment architecture with a single gateway as the entry point and a routing layer distributing across providers with fallback routes. The billing system took over subscriptions, plans, invoices, and recurring payments. All status handling was reduced to a single payment lifecycle model. Callbacks, retries, and error handling were moved into a managed layer. The team got an operational interface for transactions, disputed cases, and manual actions.
FastAPI · PostgreSQL · Redis · Payment Gateway · Multi-Provider Routing · Fallback Scenarios · Billing Engine · Subscriptions · Recurring Payments · Callback Processing · Reconciliation · Admin Panel
The payments layer went from "a set of integrations that periodically break" to a managed system. The business gained control over statuses, routes, and the transaction lifecycle.
A product with customers across regions: some pay in crypto, some in fiat. Everything was handled piecemeal — one channel for some, another for others, part of the operations by hand. As transactions grew, it became clear: what was needed wasn't one more integration, but a system that unifies channels under one logic, can switch to a fallback scenario, and gives the team visibility into statuses and money movement.
We assembled a single payment layer for different payment types. We designed the logic separating crypto and fiat flows without breaking the business process. We set up rule-based routing and fallback scenarios for channel outages. We introduced a single model of statuses and events for the product and the team. We implemented callbacks, retries, disputed-case handling, and an internal operations layer for transaction control.
FastAPI · PostgreSQL · Redis · Crypto Payment Processing · Fiat Gateway Integration · Unified Payment Layer · Multi-Channel Routing · Failover Logic · Status Lifecycle · Callback Handling · Reconciliation · Operations Dashboard
The business stopped depending on the accidental resilience of individual channels. Crypto and fiat are unified in one architecture, routing is manageable, and support sees a single stream of operations.
Bots, private-access channels, mini apps. They need crypto acceptance and subscription management without manual work or dependence on Telegram Payments.
The product grows and billing logic gets more complex. They need a system that handles subscriptions, renewals, and plans without constant rework for every new scenario.
Different regions, different payment methods. They need channel routing, fallback scenarios, and unified status logic regardless of the provider.
They need non-custodial crypto acceptance, network monitoring, transaction confirmation, and automated logic — without centralized custody of funds.
Support is drowning in manual payment checks. They need an operational interface where transactions are visible, disputed cases are manageable, and manual actions are minimal.
Payments come through, but unreliably. Statuses drift, some transactions get lost, billing behaves unpredictably. The architecture needs a review and a rebuild.
Below are reference points for typical tasks. If a project involves non-standard logic, multiple providers, crypto / fiat flows, billing, routing, or fallback scenarios, the cost is estimated individually after a short technical review.
Backend / Architecture
Blockchain / Product
Backend / Smart contracts
We build projects where mistakes aren't an option: payment systems, Web3, backend services, infrastructure, automation, high-load projects.
We don't do mass-produced websites or template solutions. We work on problems where stability, security, and the ability to scale actually matter.
Tell us what's going on — we'll tell you whether we can help and what it looks like in terms of budget and timeline. No strings attached.