Service area 01 — Asset tokenization and RWA

Tokenizing businesses
and assets to raise investment

You have an asset, a business, or a revenue model — and you want to package it into a token. But it's unclear how to do it right technically, so that you won't be embarrassed to show it to investors, lawyers, and listing platforms. We design the tokenization architecture, implement the smart contract, and bring the project to readiness for the next step.

Get a project assessment in 24 hours View case studies
A typical situation

What people come to us with

🏗️

There's an asset or business — but no structureIt's clear tokenization is needed, but not what exactly to tokenize, how to formalize investor participation, or which model to choose.

⚖️

Lawyers are on board — a tech team isn'tThe legal side is being worked out, but developers don't understand how to translate it into correct contract logic and working infrastructure.

🔍

Fear of shipping a "half-baked scheme"You want to approach investors and platforms not with an abstract idea, but with something structured that can be discussed in concrete terms.

🌍

No clarity on jurisdictionIt's unclear where to build the project, and which jurisdiction actually works for this asset type and fundraising format.

What we design

Not "make a token" — build a working model

Tokenization is an architecture problem, not just a contract

Most teams' mistake is starting with code. We start with the model: who the investor is, what they get, how the ownership logic works, which restrictions are critical, and what framework it all lives in.

Only then is the tokenization architecture shaped into a smart contract — one that won't need to be rebuilt before an audit or listing.

We work as CertiK partners, which means readiness for an institutional-grade audit — and that changes the architecture requirements from the very start.

What the client gets

Token structure and investor participation model
Ownership logic, transfer restrictions, and whitelist mechanics
Payout and income distribution logic
A smart contract (ERC-1400 / ERC-3643 / custom architecture)
Technical documentation and compliance structure
Preparation for audit and listing on specialized platforms
A foundation for scaling and investor onboarding
The cost of a mistake

An early-stage mistake isn't a fix — it's a rebuild

In tokenization projects, the wrong architecture can't be corrected with a quick fix. It means lost months, platform rejections, legal risks, and rewriting the contract almost from scratch — after the money has already been spent.

A wrong investor-rights model — platform rejection at listing
A contract without compliance architecture — a failed audit and a rewrite
The wrong jurisdiction — legal blockers at the fundraising stage
An abstract scheme with no documentation — lost investor trust
Why dimtiks

Why we're a safer choice than a regular dev team

01

We start with the model, not the code

Before writing the contract, we design the tokenization structure — the participation model, ownership logic, restrictions, and compliance framework. That prevents expensive rework. 90% of projects break because of the wrong architecture — we catch that before development.

02

CertiK partnership

We work with CertiK as authorized partners. That means the contract is designed to institutional audit requirements from the very start — not rebuilt right before one.

03

Real completed projects

Behind us: a security token for fundraising, real estate tokenization, and the structuring of an industrial asset. Not concepts — completed projects with listing-ready architecture.

04

We turn an idea into a working structure

Most developers write code to a task. We first understand the business model, then design the contract logic so it works in a real investment context.

05

ERC-1400 / ERC-3643 standards

We work with the security token standards accepted by listing platforms. Not home-grown schemes — an architecture that compliance officers and platforms understand.

06

We prepare you for the next step

We bring every project to a state where it can move forward: to audit, listing, investor onboarding. Not a prototype — a foundation for a real launch.

Our work

Completed tokenization projects

Case 01

Tokenizing a project to raise investment — from participation structure to a CertiK audit

The task

The client wanted to raise investment through a tokenized participation model. The idea of packaging into a security token was clear, but there was no complete working scheme: how to define the token structure, how to formalize investors' rights, how to account for regulatory requirements, and how to bring the project to a state where it could go to licensed platforms.

What we did

We worked out the tokenization model: the investor participation structure, ownership mechanics, transfer restrictions, and whitelist logic with listing on a licensed platform in mind. We prepared the legal and technical base: a compliance framework and a document structure for investor onboarding. We developed the smart contract on the ERC-1400 / ERC-3643 standards. We prepared it for audit with a focus on institutional-grade requirements.

• Model prepared for a $1–3M raise

• 120+ potential investors in the funnel

• Audit preparation time cut by ~40%

• The contract passed pre-audit with no critical vulnerabilities

Stack

Solidity · ERC-1400 · ERC-3643 · UUPS Proxy · Transfer Restrictions · Whitelist · CertiK Audit Prep · LibRecovery · Compliance Architecture

The client got a structured investor participation model, a security token contract, CertiK audit preparation, and the technical base for the next listing stage.

Case 02

Real estate tokenization — a property as an investment product with a security token model

The task

The client saw real estate as an asset for raising capital through tokenization. The problem: the business wanted investors, the lawyers talked about risks, and the developers didn't understand how to translate it into correct contract logic. What was needed was a coherent investment structure — not just "a token on a property".

What we did

We worked out the investment model: how the asset is structured, what the investor gets, how participation is recorded. We assembled the technical foundation: the real estate tokenization architecture, backend logic, and data flow between investor and contract. We developed a smart contract with compliance requirements and investor restrictions. We prepared it for audit and the public investment circuit through CertiK.

• Property valuation: $2.5M+

• Planned tokenization volume: $1–2M

• A model for 80+ investors

• Listing preparation: 2–3 platforms

Stack

Solidity · Security Token · Real Estate Tokenization · Compliance Architecture · Investor Restrictions · CertiK Audit · Investor Onboarding · Transfer Rules

Instead of the idea of "tokenizing a property", the client got a full investment product foundation with compliance architecture and readiness for platform placement.

Case 03

Industrial asset tokenization — jurisdiction, project structure, an investor model

The task

The client saw tokenization of an industrial asset as a capital-raising instrument. The typical problem with such projects: a strong idea at the business level, but a blurry path to execution. There was no clarity on jurisdiction, on the investor participation model, or on how to tie the asset, the financial model, and the technical implementation into one coherent structure.

What we did

We analyzed the asset and the investment logic. A separate workstream was jurisdiction selection: we matched the asset type, the investor engagement format, and the implementation requirements, and picked a practically workable option. We assembled the tokenization architecture: the ownership model, investor participation mechanics, distribution principles, and the system's outline. We prepared the project for investor negotiations.

• Asset: $5–15M (estimated range)

• A model designed for institutional investors

• Structure set up for the jurisdiction (EU / Asia)

• Preparation for negotiations with funds and private investors

Stack

Industrial Asset Tokenization · Jurisdiction Selection · Investment Model Architecture · Smart Contract Design · Investor Participation Model · RWA Structure · Token Distribution Logic

Instead of a concept, the client got an investment-legible structure: a chosen jurisdiction, an investor participation model, and the architecture for the next stage. Tokenization became a working negotiation instrument.

Who it's for

Who comes to us with this

🏢

Business owners and founders

They want to tokenize equity, a revenue model, or a company asset to raise capital through a structured instrument.

🏗️

Teams with an RWA asset

They have a real-world asset — real estate, equipment, infrastructure. They want to package it into an investment product with a clear participation model.

📊

Projects with investment logic

Raising capital through a token is already on the table, but there's no clarity on how to implement it in a technically correct and safe way.

⚖️

Projects with lawyers but no tech team

The legal side is being worked out, but there are no engineers who understand how to turn compliance requirements into a working contract architecture.

🌐

Web3 projects with tokenomics

The tokenomics exists conceptually, but it needs an implementation that accounts for security requirements, the audit, and the eventual listing.

🚀

Teams preparing for a listing

They want to reach licensed platforms or pass an institutional audit — and understand the contract has to be written to those requirements from the very start.

Budgets

Cost reference points

Every STO project differs in structure, jurisdiction, and platform requirements. Below are package reference points so you immediately understand the budget scale and depth of work.

01

Strategy / Structuring

from $8,000 – $15,000
  • Asset and tokenization model analysis
  • Selection of a workable jurisdiction and launch structure
  • Investor participation scheme
  • Basic compliance logic
  • Project architecture and launch roadmap
Discuss
02

Security Token Development

from $20,000 – $35,000
  • Security token development on ERC-1400 / ERC-3643
  • Transfer restrictions and whitelist mechanics
  • Investor / ownership logic
  • KYC / compliance provider integration
  • Contract documentation and pre-audit preparation
Discuss
Full launch
03

Full Launch / STO Package

from $65,000 – $95,000
  • Project strategy and structuring
  • Legal groundwork and document preparation
  • Security token and contract logic development
  • Pre-audit and external audit support
  • Platform listing preparation
  • Integrations, investor onboarding, and project launch
Discuss a project

The exact cost depends on the asset type, the chosen jurisdiction, the complexity of the compliance requirements, and the scope of integrations. Tell us about the project — we'll assess it and tell you which package fits.

Who we are

Who we are

Dmitrii

Backend / Architecture

Kseniya

Blockchain / Product

Albert

Backend / Smart contracts

7+
years in engineering
Web3
SaaS / Fintech
Global
clients across multiple countries
High
load and reliability

We build projects where mistakes aren't an option: payment systems, Web3, backend services, infrastructure, automation, high-load projects.

We don't do mass-produced websites or template solutions. We work on problems where stability, security, and the ability to scale actually matter.

  • you need a non-standard system built
  • you need the architecture reworked
  • you need an audit before launch
  • you need the project prepared for growth
  • you need complex business logic implemented
Talk to us directly
Get started

Let's break down your asset and tokenization model

Tell us what the asset is and what the goal is — we'll tell you whether we can help and what it looks like in terms of structure, timeline, and budget. No strings attached.

Message us on Telegram Message us on WhatsApp